Compression = intelligence? The Hutter Prize is intended to encourage research in Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) by offering (currently) a 50,000€ (about $70,000) prize for solving a specific problem. The general idea is along the lines of the X prize: by offering a modest prize, one can provoke research that would cost much more than that – along with generating lots of passion, enthusiasm, and competition. All good.
The challenge with AGI is what one would award a prize for. So far the achievements of AGI are esoteric, certainly not accessible to anyone other than specialists in the field. Furthermore, there is legitimate debate about whether even AGI's successes are anything more than trivialities wrapped up in complicated software and fancy words. Nobody has yet done anything actually useful (or even entertaining) with AGI yet.
So what kind of a goal would be worth a prize?
The Hutter Prize folks chose lossless data compression of a specific English text file, and I don't know whether to laugh ... or laugh. Their premise is that solving compression problems is equivalent in some way to general intelligence. I know a little bit about data compression, and I know some people who are genuinely experts. I know much less about AGI. I don't recall ever talking with them about the Hutter Prize, but I'm pretty sure I can predict their reaction: the act of writing a data compression program might require intelligence (it certainly requires persistence!), but the resulting data compression program isn't going to be “intelligent” by any definition of that word!
But if you're into data compression, especially if you're a starving student, maybe that Hutter Prize will spur you into developing the next best data compression algorithm!
Sunday, March 16, 2014
Schadenfreude moment...
Schadenfreude moment... This morning I read these words in the middle of a much longer article:
But that's not what brought on the delicious, soul-warming schadenfreude. This is: I read those words in the New York Times, the paper of progressive-mongering. Bwaahahahaha!
Most Democrats up for re-election are trying to put some distance between themselves and the president, choosing surrogates such as Mr. Clinton to campaign for them, particularly in the South and parts of the West.
Asked whether Mr. Obama is a liability, Representative Ami Bera, Democrat of California, demurred. “We haven’t really focused much on the president,” he said. “We’re focused on Sacramento County and the folks that are there.”
Other Democrats are openly critical of the health care law in their advertisements. In one ad promoting Representative Ann Kirkpatrick, Democrat of Arizona, the narrator says she “blew the whistle on the disastrous health care website, calling it ‘stunning ineptitude,’ and worked to fix it.”
But that's not what brought on the delicious, soul-warming schadenfreude. This is: I read those words in the New York Times, the paper of progressive-mongering. Bwaahahahaha!
Things that make you go “Hmmmm...”
