Candidate Obama campaigned on narrowing presidential wartime power, closing Guantanamo Bay, trying terrorists in civilian courts, ending enhanced interrogation, and moving away from a wartime approach to terrorism toward a criminal-justice approach. Mr. Obama has avoided these vexing detention issues simply by depriving terrorists of all of their rights—by killing them.This is from an article Mr. Yoo has in today's Wall Street Journal.
My readers will, I think, be unsurprised to learn that I have no problem with executing, assasinating, murdering, vaporizing, or otherwise killing terrorists. If the methods used are unsavory or inhumane, that also gives me no problem. None at all, on either count. I have more concern about the proprieties of killing cockroaches than I do about some asshole who thinks killing innocent people is ok.
I do, however, have a problem with a president setting himself up as the sole arbiter of who we target for such killings. There are way too many problems with such an arrangement, not least of which are trusting the accuracy of the information made available to the president and trusting the judgement of the president. Furthermore, it's not farfetched to note that a logical extension of Obama's process is to use drones in the U.S. to assasinate people here whom the president designates as enemies – with no due process at all, justified as required by the emergency situation. The opacity and lack of accountability in Obama's chosen “kill list” process is, I believe, simply unacceptable – and downright dangerous.
Mr. Yoo has skin in this argument as a member of the previous administration. Nonetheless, his point about the far greater transparency and accountability in the Bush administration is well taken – especially given the rhetoric of candidate Obama in 2008...
No comments:
Post a Comment