NASA's temperature data was less reliable (according to NASA itself) than the data CRU had – so NASA used some of CRU's data. The significance of this is that (contrary to claims by all involved) the datasets used by the IPCC were not independent and cross-verifying. Just one more nail in that “settled science” trope...
A nice analysis of urban heat island effect, using Fort Collins and Boulder...
What might be better than tree rings as a proxy for pre-1900s temperatures? Clams. Seriously!
Interesting new Gallup poll results on how Americans feel about AGW...
Harold Ambler ponders scientists access to the press, especially skeptical scientists (noting especially the impact of ClimateGate on the ability of scientists skeptical of AGW to get the notice of the press)...
No comments:
Post a Comment