Jamulian Weather...

By popular request, here are the graphs showing the wind, barometric pressure, and rainfall from Monday's storm...

ClimateGate: Looking Closely at the Data...

Willis Eschenbach has been doing exactly that, this time at the Australian temperature data series used in the IPCC report.  Step by step, he picks apart the differences between the raw data and the “fudged” data discussed in the CRU emails.  He finds:

Yikes again, double yikes! What on earth justifies that adjustment? How can they do that? We have five different records covering Darwin from 1941 on. They all agree almost exactly. Why adjust them at all? They’ve just added a huge artificial totally imaginary trend to the last half of the raw data! Now it looks like the IPCC diagram in Figure 1, all right … but a six degree per century trend? And in the shape of a regular stepped pyramid climbing to heaven? What’s up with that?

Those, dear friends, are the clumsy fingerprints of someone messing with the data Egyptian style … they are indisputable evidence that the “homogenized” data has been changed to fit someone’s preconceptions about whether the earth is warming.

One thing is clear from this. People who say that “Climategate was only about scientists behaving badly, but the data is OK” are wrong. At least one part of the data is bad, too. The Smoking Gun for that statement is at Darwin Zero.

Go read the whole thing...