“Maybe that’s the case; maybe they’re not gettable. I don’t know... As far as we know, they are in Pakistan,” Clinton told senior Pakistani newspaper editors in Lahore, AFP reported. “The percentage of taxes on GDP (in Pakistan) is among the lowest in the world... We (the United States) tax everything that moves and doesn’t move, and that’s not what we see in Pakistan,” she said.What the heck is she saying? That first sentence is, I believe, referring to Bin Laden and al Qaeda. The rest of it is slamming the low tax rates in Pakistan.
First, you gotta love the frank admission of the Democratic strategy: tax it, whether it moves or not. No wonder our wallets are getting lighter.
But then she seems to be implying that the reason Pakistan is suffering from terrorist attacks is the low tax rates there. Is that really what she means? If so, she's even wackier than I thought (and that takes some doin', if you know what I mean)!
No comments:
Post a Comment